A- de 1999
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
✓Claimant Martha Dora Patiño Toro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se ordenó remitir el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria, para que ella defina a cuál de los dos juzgados civiles del Circuito le corresponde asumir el conocimiento de la tutela incoada por la accionante contra la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social, toda vez que es la mencionada Sala como superior común, quien debe dirimir el conflicto negativo suscitado entre los dos Juzgados pertenecientes a diferentes distritos judiciales.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE:
- REMITASE el expediente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria, para que ella defina a cual de los dos juzgados civiles del Circuito le corresponde asumir el conocimiento de la accion de tutela incoada por MARTHA DORA PATINO TORO contra la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.